Baseball

Combined No-Hitters Shouldn’t Count, Says Baseball Analyst

A critical look at MLB's record-keeping and the role of relievers in modern pitching feats

The author contends that a combined no-hitter, in which multiple pitchers share the workload, fails to capture the full significance of a single starter dominating an entire game.

When the Houston Astros recently assembled a combined no-hitter, the starter, Tatsuya Imai, worked six scoreless innings but walked four batters and struck out only two, illustrating the uneven contribution of the bullpen.

In contrast, Brewers ace Jacob Misiorowski delivered a more commanding outing, surrendering just two hits over seven innings while fanning twelve Cardinals batters, underscoring how a dominant starter can still achieve a no-hit performance.

Why the Record Needs Redefining

The piece recalls the 2020 season, when MLB declined to recognize seven-inning no-hitters, and notes that the author was present for a combined no-hitter in the World Series, finding the achievement underwhelming.

The author argues that relievers enjoy a distinct advantage in these hybrid feats — fresh arms and hitters unacquainted with their repertoire — making the statistical record less reflective of pure pitching mastery.

Ultimately, the writer maintains that a true no-hitter should be defined by a starting pitcher completing the game without allowing a single hit, and that combined efforts ought to be excised from the official record books.

Published by SocketNews.com powered news Editorial Team Structured news coverage generated from verified editorial data fields. About Editorial Policy Contact