The latest episode of the Football Debate Club podcast featured analysts Simon Clancy and Jacob Infante dissecting the Miami Dolphins' approach to the upcoming draft, a conversation that has been amplified by speculation linking the team to quarterback prospect Arch Manning.
Clancy pointed to the team's recent moves, including the three‑year, $67.5 million contract with $45 million guaranteed for quarterback Malik Willis, as evidence that the franchise is building around a future starter rather than deliberately losing games.
Infante added that the Dolphins face a demanding 2026 schedule, with matchups against strong opponents in the NFC North and AFC West, which could naturally push them into a high draft position without any intentional tanking.
Both analysts emphasized that Arch Manning will not be available for the 2026 NFL Draft, as he plans to return to Texas for his senior season, making the notion of a direct trade for the quarterback unrealistic.
They also noted that while a top quarterback prospect remains a priority, the path to acquiring one — whether through a high pick or free‑agency acquisition — does not require a conscious effort to lose.
The conversation concluded with a consensus that the Dolphins' strategy is focused on sustainable growth, leveraging roster depth and draft capital while avoiding the pitfalls associated with a full‑scale rebuild.
The Case Against Tanking
Clancy argued that the front office's public statements and the nature of the Willis contract signal a commitment to competitiveness, making a deliberate tank inconsistent with their messaging.
Infante countered that even if a high draft pick emerges from a tough schedule, the team would still be positioned to select a premier talent without having to sacrifice on‑field integrity.