Basketball

Kashie Natt Sues NCAA Over Eligibility Clock, Seeks Fifth Year of Play

The lawsuit challenges the governing body’s five‑for‑five model and could reshape college basketball rules.

A Legal Challenge Emerges

Kashie Natt, a forward for Oklahoma State’s men’s basketball team, has launched a lawsuit against the NCAA in an effort to secure a fifth year of athletic eligibility. The complaint argues that the organization’s eligibility rules were misapplied, causing his five‑year clock to start when he enrolled at LSU Alexandria in August 2022 rather than when he first entered college.

The case follows the NCAA Division‑I Cabinet’s recent approval of a five‑for‑five eligibility model, which permits athletes to compete for up to five years within a ten‑year window. While the policy was designed to provide flexibility, Natt contends that the governing body failed to honor the terms of his eligibility waiver, effectively blocking his participation in the upcoming season.

From Shreveport to Stillwater

Natt’s collegiate journey began at Southern University‑Shreveport before he spent two seasons at the NAIA’s LSU Alexandria campus. He later transferred to Sam Houston State, where he earned Conference USA Defensive Player of the Year honors, averaging 10.8 points and 8.2 rebounds while leading the league in steals, defensive rebounds and double‑doubles. His defensive prowess and rebounding dominance have made him a key prospect for Oklahoma State.

The lawsuit asserts that the NCAA breached its contractual obligations by not properly evaluating the five‑year‑clock issue, a claim that could set a precedent for other athletes seeking additional eligibility. As the case unfolds, the NCAA’s roster listings show Natt removed from the Cowboys’ online roster, leaving the team with only 13 of the 15 scholarship spots available.

Broader Implications

Natt’s legal action is not isolated; teammate Parsa Fallah is also pursuing an eligibility waiver, underscoring a growing trend of athletes challenging the NCAA’s eligibility framework. If successful, the case could influence how the five‑for‑five model is enforced across Division I sports, potentially reshaping scholarship limits, roster management and the overall landscape of college athletics.

Published by SocketNews.com powered news Editorial Team Structured news coverage generated from verified editorial data fields. About Editorial Policy Contact